Como sabem o Nissan Leaf é feito na mesma fábrica que o Nissan Juke e em princípio terá alguma partilha de sua estrutura base entre ambos, daí, e à falta do teste do Leaf, deixo aqui o resultado do Juke.
"Detailed information (PDF)Comparable
DriverPassenger
IMPACT
13.7 pts
CarPole
SIDE IMPACT CAR
7.7 pts
SIDE IMPACT POLE
7.4 pts
2.7 pts
Total 40 pts | 81%
PERFORMANCE
10.7 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
18 month old child
Restraint FAIR BIMBOFIX G0/1S
Group 0, 0+
Facing Rearward
Installation ISOFIX anchorages and support frame
PERFORMANCE
12.0 pts
INSTRUCTIONS
4.0 pts
INSTALLATION
2.0 pts
3 year old child
Restraint RÖMER BRITAX DUO+
Group 1
Facing Forward
Installation ISOFIX anchorages and top tether
5.0 pts
See comments
Total 15 pts | 41%
HEAD
9.5 pts
PELVIS
0.8 pts
LEG
4.4 pts
Total 5 pts | 71%
SPEED LIMITATION ASSISTANCE
0.0 pts
- Active
- Optional
ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC)
3.0 pts
- Standard
SEATBELT REMINDER
2.0 pts
- driver
- passenger
Details of tested car
Specifications
Tested model Nissan Juke 1.6 Acenta, LHD
Body type 5 door hatchback
Year of publication 2011
Kerb weight 1172kg
VIN from which rating applies Applies to all applies Jukes of the specification tested
Class Supermini.
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag
Front passenger frontal airbag
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Comments
Adult occupant
The passenger compartment of the Juke remained stable in the frontal impact and rearward movement of the steering wheel movement was small. Measurements in the dummies' knees and femurs did not indicate a problem but, on both the driver and passenger side, structures in the dashboard were considered to present a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sat in different positions. Accordingly, protection in this area was rated as marginal. Protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision was also rated as marginal.
Child occupant
The Juke scored maximum points for its protection of the 3 year old dummy in the dynamic tests. Movement of both child’s heads was controlled in the frontal impact and side barrier test. The front seat passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. However, information provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag is not sufficiently clear. The dangers of using a rearward facing seat in that seat without first disabling the airbag were clearly explained and permanently visible on the sun visor in the appropriate European languages.
Pedestrian
The bonnet provided good protection in most areas likely to be struck by a child's head, but was almost completely poor in those areas where an adult’s head would hit. The front edge of the bonnet also offered poor protection in almost every area tested.
Safety assist
Electronic stability control is standard equipment on the Juke, as is a seatbelt reminder for the driver and front seat passenger seating positions. Both of which met the Euro NCAP requirements. A driver-set speed limitation device did not qualify for assessment as it is available only as an option."
Em: http://www.euroncap.com/results/nissan/ ... 1/423.aspx
